India Ranked Last in Partner Satisfaction. The Reason Is Not What You Think.

In February 2026, Ipsos published its Love Life Satisfaction Survey, covering 29 countries and roughly 23,000 respondents globally. The headline finding for India was blunt: last place in partner satisfaction. Bottom three on the overall Love Life Satisfaction Index, alongside Japan and South Korea.

The survey did not bury this in footnotes. It named it plainly. Among the 29 markets surveyed, India ranked lowest on the measure of people who describe their relationship with their spouse or partner as loving. Two in three Indians, 67%, said their relationship was loving. That number sounds reasonable until you see where it sits relative to everywhere else. Sixty-seven percent was the floor.

There is a particular discomfort in reading a finding like this. The instinct is to push back. To cite the Kamasutra. To point out that India invented romantic poetry, that we have entire classical traditions devoted to longing and union, that we wear love on our cinema screens in four-hour formats with intermissions. And then you read the methodology again and realize the survey was not measuring cultural output. It was measuring how people personally felt, right now, in their actual relationships.

That is a different question. And India's answer was quieter than its reputation suggests.

The Kamasutra Problem

The Ipsos India CEO, Suresh Ramalingam, named the irony directly in his statement on the findings: India's lower ranking presents a striking contrast to its longstanding cultural association with romance and intimacy, often symbolized by the Kamasutra.

The Kamasutra remark is doing a lot of work. Because the Kamasutra is, famously, a 2,000-year-old text. And national romantic reputation, it turns out, depreciates.

What Ramalingam was getting at is something more useful: cultural legacy and lived experience are not the same measurement. India has enormous cultural investment in the idea of love, in devotional poetry, in the spectacle of wedding seasons that span multiple cities and weeks, in cinema that treats romantic longing as a near-sacred state. What the survey measured was whether individual people, sitting in their actual lives, felt loved by their actual partners on an ordinary Tuesday.

The gap between those two things is the whole conversation.

What the Numbers Actually Say

The Ipsos Love Life Satisfaction Index combines three measures: satisfaction with the love in your life, satisfaction with your sex life, and satisfaction with your relationship with your partner. India ranked poorly on the composite and last on the partner-specific measure.

But the same survey showed something that deserves equal attention: on romantic and sexual satisfaction, India ranked 8th among the 29 markets surveyed. Ahead of most of Europe. Behind Thailand and Indonesia, roughly alongside Mexico, Spain, and Colombia, but solidly in the top third globally.

India ranked 8th in the world for romantic and sexual satisfaction. And dead last for feeling loved. Those are not the same thing, and the gap between them is the whole story.

This split is not a statistical quirk. It is pointing at something specific about how emotional connection is being experienced in Indian relationships, something that is distinct from physical intimacy or the cultural performance of romance. People are having romantic lives. They are not feeling sufficiently seen, known, or affirmed within their closest relationship.

The Joint Family Living Room

To understand why, it helps to think about the structural realities of Indian relationships rather than the emotional ones.

Ramalingam's statement pointed to "multi-generational family responsibilities, shifting expectations within marriages, and the pressures of balancing work and household commitments" as contributing factors. This is diplomatic language for something that many Indian couples know more viscerally: the relationship is almost never just two people.

In a joint family setup, or even in a nuclear family with heavy extended-family presence, every large decision passes through layers of consultation. Where you live. What you earn. When you have children. How you spend Diwali. The couple exists inside a larger system, and that system has opinions. The intimacy that gets crowded out first is not physical. It is the slower kind: the conversations that only happen in private, the emotional exposure that requires uninterrupted space, the gradual accumulation of being truly known by one person.

The Sunday morning call from the in-laws, the WhatsApp family group that is always watching, the pressure on women especially to manage everyone's comfort while their own needs sit quietly at the back of the queue. None of this is unique to India, but the density of it is. And it shows up in a gap between people who are functionally in relationships and people who feel emotionally held within them.

There is also something worth naming about how love is expressed in many Indian households: through action rather than language. The chai made at a specific temperature, the dal that takes three hours because someone knew you needed it today, the quiet logistics of remembering a preference. This is real love. It is also largely invisible as love if the person receiving it needed to hear the words and is not hearing them. The survey measures felt experience. In many Indian relationships, love is present but not legible in the form the recipient was hoping for.

The Arranged and Love Marriage Layer

The picture gets more complicated when you account for India's specific relationship landscape, which does not map cleanly onto the Western models that most global surveys assume.

India still has a large proportion of relationships that begin through family arrangement, whether fully arranged or "semi-arranged" where families introduce and couples decide. This is not inherently a satisfaction problem. Many arranged marriages report high durability and contentment. But "durability" and "I feel deeply loved by this person" are not the same metric, and a survey that asks the latter is asking something different from what many Indian relationships were designed, at the outset, to prioritize.

The expectations that enter an arranged match often emphasize compatibility, stability, and family approval. Emotional intimacy, the felt sense of being chosen by someone who knew you and wanted specifically you, is a different category of need. For people inside relationships that fulfilled the former without fully delivering the latter, the Ipsos question about feeling loved would land somewhere complicated.

This is not a verdict on arranged marriage. It is an observation about what "satisfaction" measures when different people entered their relationships with different primary goals.

Money and Love, Together as Always

The Ipsos survey also found a consistent pattern globally: people in high-income households were 10 percentage points more likely to report satisfaction with the love in their lives than those in low-income households. For romantic and sex life satisfaction specifically, the gap was 14 percentage points.

This is not a surprise if you think about what financial pressure does to intimacy. A couple managing rent stress, EMI anxiety, job instability, and the cost of raising a child in a metro city is a couple whose emotional bandwidth is being continuously taxed. The arguments that feel like they are about love are often about money. The distance that feels like emotional withdrawal is often exhaustion. The feeling of not being seen is often the feeling of your partner being too depleted to see clearly.

In India, where a significant portion of the urban professional class is simultaneously managing career pressure, parental expectations, and the logistical weight of city life, the emotional margin inside relationships is thin. Not because people do not love each other. Because loving someone well takes time and attention, and those are exactly the resources that get rationed first.

The Number That Matters More

Two in three Indians said their relationship with their partner was loving. Sixty-seven percent is not nothing. Suresh Ramalingam was careful to note this in the survey statement: the ranking is relative across markets, not an absolute measure of dissatisfaction.

That matters. India is not a country of unhappy relationships. It is a country where the emotional dimension of relationships, the felt sense of being loved rather than the structural fact of being in a relationship, is running behind where people would like it to be.

And that gap is named now. The Ipsos survey has given language to something that many Indian couples quietly sense but do not have the framework to address. The question is what you do with the data.

What Actually Changes Things

The findings point toward a specific kind of need: not more romance in the cinematic sense, not more elaborate gestures, but more emotional legibility. The felt sense of being known. The experience of having your partner understand, without prompting, what you actually need right now.

This is the work that happens inside a relationship, not before it. It is the thing that dating apps, which are optimized to get two people into a room together, almost universally fail to support once the match has happened. You find someone. The app closes. The real work, which turns out to be the harder work, begins, and there is no infrastructure for it.

This is why the distinction between a dating app and a relationship platform matters. Not as a product-marketing point but as a practical one: the Ipsos gap is not happening at the point of meeting. It is happening in the years after. People are finding partners. They are not consistently finding the emotional depth they wanted once they got there.

Coaching tools, conversation frameworks, the kind of support that helps two people actually understand each other rather than just share a home and a calendar, address something the courtship phase never reaches. The satisfaction deficit the survey found is not a problem at the top of the funnel. It is a problem in the middle of a life.

What the Last-Place Ranking Is Actually Telling You

India ranking last in partner satisfaction is not a verdict on Indian love. It is a measurement of a specific gap, in a specific moment, shaped by specific structural pressures: family systems that crowd intimacy, emotional languages that do not always translate between partners, economic strain that narrows the bandwidth for connection, and relationships formed under frameworks that did not always prioritize the felt sense of being chosen.

None of that is permanent. None of it is inevitable. What it is, is visible now. And things that are visible can be worked on.

The most useful thing the Ipsos survey does is shift the conversation from "are we in a relationship" to "are we actually inside this relationship." From proximity to presence. From the fact of a partner to the experience of being loved by that specific person, legibly, in a way that lands.

That question, quietly and persistently asked, is what changes the number.

Feeling known changes everything.

Pinnaya is built for the whole relationship, not just the beginning of it. With AI relationship coaching and tools that help you and your partner actually understand each other, it is a platform that stays useful long after the first match. Because getting there is only part of it.

Visit Pinnaya.com | Download on iOS | Download on Android